Content Curated By Darin R. McClure & a few photos


Iran War Worry Watch
March 18, 2013, 7:46 am
Filed under: Uncategorized

Iran War Worry Watch:

Last week President Obama
told Israeli TV news
that he is confident Iran is only “over a
year or so” away from having a nuclear weapon:
Sanctions for Iran Poster: United Nations

“Right now, we think it would take over a year or so for Iran to
actually develop a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don’t want to
cut it too close,” Obama told Israeli Channel 2.
“They are not yet at the point I think where they’ve made a
fundamental decision to get right with the international
community,” he said, “but I do think that they’re recognizing that
there’s a severe cost for them to continue on the path that they’re
on and that there’s another door open.”….
“When I’m consulting with Bibi, as I have over the last several
years on this issue, my message to him will be the same as before:
If we can resolve it diplomatically that is a more lasting
solution,” Obama said in the interview.
“But if not,” he added, “I continue to keep all options on the
table.”
Earlier this month, Vice
President Joe Biden warned Iran
 in a spirited speech to
the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, the powerful
pro-Israel lobby, that those “options” include U.S. military
action.
“Let me make clear what that commitment is:  It is to
prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.  Period.
End of discussion.  Prevent — not contain – prevent,” Biden
said.

And yet, and yet:

U.S. officials have said they believe Iran is developing the
technical capability to be able to sprint to a obtaining a nuclear
weapon on short notice but has not yet actually decided to pursue
that course.

“The intelligence we have is they have not made the decision to
proceed with the development a nuclear weapon,” outgoing Defense
Secretary Leon Panetta said in an interview last month.  ”I
can’t tell you they are in fact pursuing a weapon, because that’s
what not intelligence say they’re doing right now.”

And, completely coincidentally, the Washington Post
tells us today that various high mucketymucks are reporting
more in sorrow than in anger that, well,
sanctions just don’t seem to be working
to stop the Iranians
from doing whatever it is they are doing:

Harsh economic sanctions have taken a serious
toll on Iran’s economy
, but U.S. and European officials
acknowledge that the measures have not yet produced the kind of
public unrest that could force Iranian leaders to change their
nuclear policies.
Nine months after Iran was hit with the toughest restrictions in
its history, the nation’s economy appears to have settled into a
slow, downward glide, hemorrhaging jobs and hard currency but
appearing to be in no immediate danger of collapse, Western
diplomats and analysts say…..
Marine Gen. James Mattis, head of U.S. Central Command, said
Iran has accelerated its nuclear program in the past year, despite
the diplomatic and economic pressure. Iran continues “enriching
uranium beyond any plausible peaceful purpose” and is probably
using negotiations to stall for time, Mattis told the Senate Armed
Services Committee on March 5.
“I’m paid to take a rather dim view of the Iranians, frankly,”
he added.

Yes, General, yes you are.
Some interesting details on the specifics of how the current
round of sanctions is working:

The United States has granted six-month exemptions to all 20 of
Iran’s major oil buyers in return for pledges to reduce the amount
they buy. Among the exempted countries are China and India, Iran’s
No. 1 and No. 2 oil customers, respectively.
Iranian oil exports, though sharply down compared with 2011,
increased slightly in February, according to figures released by
the International Energy Agency. The agency said Iran’s exports
totaled 1.28 million barrels a day in February, compared with 1.13
million barrels the month before.
A senior administration official said cheating by Iran could
help explain the unexpected spike…

“Cheating.” An attempt to sell a wanted product in the world
market to willing customers is “cheating” because we say they
aren’t allowed to do it. Alas, sanctions are not a game–they are a
damaging act of war–but one that, as the rest of that
Post article and most history demonstrate, harms people
other than the government we are allegedly targeting first. Our
goal: to make the people so unhappy they begin rioting in the
streets. Why might these crazy Iranians be so truculent about just
doing whatever we say?
Adding the two stories together–we will not let them have
nuclear weapons (even though we aren’t sure they are trying)! Our
current form of low-grade economic warfare isn’t making them
surrender!–leads to a very grim result.
Reason on
Iran
.


Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: